Department of Administrative Services > Divisions > Collective Bargaining

Grievance Information Detail

OCB Case Number

Old Grievance Number

Award Number

Grievant's Name

Arbitrator

Agency

Union

First Chair

Union Advocate

Second Chair

Arbitration Date

Decision Date

Decision

Cost

Contract Articles

28,28.01,28.03,28.04,30,30.01,30.02,AGENCY

Attachment List

2728
Cruse Arb Summary

Contract Violations

Holding

Grievance DENIED. The Arbitrator found that the scoring methodology of the Screening Tool complied with Article 30.02, and the Employer complied with the scoring methodology when awarding points to the applicants. Since the tool was not illogical, arbitrary, or unreasonable and the application of the methodology was consistent, the Grievant was appropriately scored and not the most-qualified candidate for the senior parole position.