Grievance Information Detail
Granted: Arbitrator found that the grievant was wrongfully terminated because the Employer disciplined the grievant as if he had been convicted of an OVI when that was not the case. Upon the Employer's decision, the grievant's fate had not yet been determined. Agitating circumstances, the grievant did not end up being convicted of an OVI. Law enforcement may be held to higher standards, but their off-duty conduct must be relevant to their employment for it to warrant termination. A three-factor test determines when that is so. Moreover, an arrest, in and of itself, is insufficient to cite as harm.