Grievance Information Detail

AWARD: 0754 GRIEVANT, AN OFFICE ASSISTANT 2 AT THE BUREAU OF DISABILITY DETERMINATION, WAS REMOVED FOR UNAPPROVED ABSENCES, CONVICTION OF A DRUG CHARGE, AND Failure TO REPORT THE CONVICTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE'S DRUG-FREE Workplace POLICY. THE UNION ARGUED THAT MANAGEMENT ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDES R.C. 2925.11(C)(3) And (D) AND CASE STATE VS. WEBER WHICH PROVIDE EXCEPTIONS FOR MINOR MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS. MANAGEMENT'S INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED FAIRLY. THEYì TALKED ONLY TO MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL. GRIEVANT HAD A GOOD WORK RECORD, YEARì LONG EAP INVOLVEMENT, AND SUICIDE ATTEMPT. MANAGEMENT ARGUED THAT THE GRIEVANT WAS CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL DRUG STATUTEì AS A RESULT OF WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR. THE UNION'S RELIANCE ON STATE VS. WEBER IS NOT VALID BECAUSE "WEBER" PREDATES THE ACT AND THUS IS NOT CONTROLLING. ALSO, THE WEBER CASE DOES NOT STAND FOR THE PROPOSITION THAT THE GRIEVANT'S OFFENSE IS NOT A CONVICTION BECAUSE IT IS A MINOR MISDEMEANOR. INSTEAD, THE WEB