Grievance Information Detail
DENIED. The Arbitrator found that the Employer's overtime system was not arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory. The Grievant charged that offering overtime which would be worked 12ì hours after their regular shift and 4 hours before their next shift wasì exceptionaly burdensome, and that refusals should not count towardì equalization calulations as per Article 61.03. The Arbitrator found that the overtime offer was not arbitrary,ì capricious nor discriminatory - the test as laid out in the Agreement. Theì mission of the Employer determined what overtime opportunities existed, andì nothing in the Agreement bars inconvenience in overtime opportunities, soì long as the basic test of the contract is met.